Lower Courts (Subordinate Courts)
- * Articles 233 to 237 in Part 6 of the Indian Constitution mention subordinate courts or subordinate judicial bodies.
- * Supreme Court and High Courts, being higher courts, are in the Union List. Whereas, lower courts are in the State List.
- * All lower courts in the state function under the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court.
- * According to Article 233, the "Governor" appoints the Chief and other judges of the District and Sessions Court.
Qualifications required to be appointed as a District Judge:
- 1. Must be a citizen of India.
- 2. Must have practiced as an advocate for 7 years. And must be recommended by the High Court.
- 3. Must be an officer in Central (or) State services.
District and Sessions Court:
- * The court at the district level after the High Court is referred to as the Sessions Court.
- * The state government establishes the District Court.
- * District and Sessions Court can impose sentences from life imprisonment to the death penalty. However, the death penalty can be executed only after being certified by the High Court.
- * District Court and Sessions Court should be understood as the same court.
- * The same judge acts as District Judge when hearing common civil cases and as Sessions Judge when hearing criminal cases.
Subordinate Courts:
- * Subordinate courts are described as courts at a level below the District Court.
- * Sub-Court - Judges are appointed by the Governor in consultation with the High Court and the State Public Service Commission.
- * This court can impose sentences up to 7 years.
Munsiff Magistrate Court:
- * Courts at a level below the Subordinate Court are referred to as Munsiff Magistrate Courts.
- * Can impose sentences up to 3 years.
Fast Track Courts:
- * Fast Track Courts were established from the year 2000 based on the recommendations of the 11th Finance Commission to expedite the resolution of cases pending in the country for a long time.
- * 492 Fast Track Courts were established in our country in 2000 itself.
- * Currently, 1192 Fast Track Courts have been established in the country.
- * 162 Fast Track Courts were newly established after the Nirbhaya case.
- * Uttar Pradesh has the highest number of Fast Track Courts at 242.
- * Unified Andhra Pradesh had 86.
- * State governments are running Fast Track Courts at their own expense.
Nyaya Panchayats (Village Courts):
- * These are the lowest level courts working at the village level. They are established by the State Legislature through law.
- * These are also called Panchayat Adalats, or Gram Kachahri.
- * Minor civil and criminal cases are resolved in these.
Judicial Magistrate Court:
- * This system was established in 1973 through the Criminal Procedure Code.
- * The Judicial Magistrate only resolves criminal cases.
- * This system does not apply to Nagaland. Therefore, in this state, the Collector, who is the head of the executive branch, acts as a judicial officer.
Chief Judicial Magistrate:
- * Acts as the head of criminal courts in the district.
City Civil Court:
- * These courts were established in metropolitan cities for the resolution of civil cases.
Metropolitan Magistrate Court:
- * The designation of Metropolitan Magistrate is equivalent to the designation of Judicial Magistrate.
- * This system is established in metropolitan cities for the resolution of (criminal cases).
Note:
- Chief Judicial Magistrate and Metropolitan Magistrate Courts function under the control of the High Court.
Executive Magistrate Court:
- * Executive Magistrate means Collector. He works under government control.
- * As a Collector Magistrate, he undertakes these (following) peace and security measures:
- 1. Imposing Section 144.
- 2. Imposing Curfew.
- 3. Issuing Firing Orders.
- 4. Supervising police stations and prisons in the district.
- 5. Issuing weapons licenses, petrol bunk licenses.
Small Causes Courts:
- * These were established in some states and presidency cities.
- * Only civil cases of low value are resolved in these courts.
Note:
- All the courts mentioned above function within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
- * These must give judgments in accordance with the judgments given by the Supreme Court.
- * If a judgment is given contrary to the judgment given by the Supreme Court, it is considered as contempt of court.
No comments:
Post a Comment