Okay, here are the notes summarizing the key points from the Telugu lecture on Indian economic reforms, focusing on Industrial Reforms of 1991, Foreign Technology, and Foreign Investment policies:
Background: Continuation of discussion on 1991 economic reforms, specifically focusing onIndustrial Reforms .New Industrial Policy (NIP) 1991: Announced on July 24, 1991 .A cornerstone of the 1991 industrial reforms. Shift in Focus: Differed significantly from previous policies that prioritized the Public Sector. NIP 1991 emphasized and gave importance to thePrivate Sector .Introduced principles of LPG (Liberalization, Privatization, Globalization) into the industrial framework.
Key Measures under NIP 1991 (Recap): Abolition of Industrial Licensing (Licensing Raj). Reforms/Restructuring of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). Replacement of FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) with FEMA (Foreign Exchange Management Act). Replacement of MRTP (Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices) Act with the Competition Act. Initiation of the Privatization process.
Definition: In this context, "Technology" primarily refers toMachinery and Equipment (యంత్రాలు) . Foreign Technology means importing and using foreign machinery.Pre-1991 Situation: Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) heavily relied on imported technology (e.g., Steel Plants - Rourkela from Germany, Bhilai/Bokaro from USSR, Durgapur from UK). The government facilitated these imports. Private Sector faced strict restrictions. They neededprior government permission to import foreign technology/machinery.Rationale for Restrictions: To protect small-scale industries and prevent market domination by large private companies using superior foreign technology (e.g., permission denied for advanced power looms to protect handloom weavers).
NIP 1991 Relaxation: Rule Introduced: Automatic approval (no prior govt. permission needed) for importing foreign technology with a valueup to ₹100 crore .Condition: If the technology valueexceeded ₹100 crore , prior government permission wasstill required .Impact: Allowed Indian companies easier access to better machinery, leading to improved production quality and private sector growth. This was a key aspect ofLiberalization .
Later Development (June 2016): The Modi government removed the ₹100 crore ceiling .Current Rule: Indian companies can import foreign technology ofany value generally without prior government permission (automatic route).
Royalty: Companies using foreign technology often need to makeroyalty payments to the technology provider.Example: Mahindra XUV700 using an engine based on German technology, imported and adapted. Showcases successful use of accessible foreign tech.
Pre-1991 Situation: Foreign companies investing in India were limited to a maximum equity stake of 49% .Minimum 51% stake had to be Indian .This ensured Indian control over joint ventures.
Post-1991 Reforms: Reflecting globalization commitments (e.g., to IMF). FDI limits were liberalized. Foreign companies were allowedmore than 49% stake .Sector-Specific Caps: FDI limits became dependent on the sector, ranging from51% up to 100% .100% FDI: Allowed in many sectors, enabling full foreign ownership.
Facilitation Bodies: FIPB (Foreign Investment Promotion Board): Established in Feb 1992 to invite and facilitate FDI, streamlining approvals (later moved online).FIPB Abolished (around 2017): Replaced by a system often involvingDIPP (now DPIIT - Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade) , aiming for faster online approvals.
Sector-Specific FDI Limits (Examples Discussed): Prohibited Sectors (Black List - No FDI): Lottery, Betting, Gambling, Casino, Chit Funds, Nidhi Companies, Atomic Energy, core Space & Defense activities.20% Cap: Public Sector Banks (PSBs).26% Cap: Print Media (Newspapers, Current Affairs), Digital Media (News, Current Affairs).49% Cap (Examples): Pension Sector, Power Exchanges, Broadcasting Content Services (DTH/Cable - cap varies), Stock Exchange Infrastructure, Airlines (Automatic route), Telecom (Automatic route -speaker's info, now largely 100% ).51% Cap: Multi-Brand Retail Trading (Requires 49% Indian partner).74% Cap (Automatic Route Examples): Brownfield Pharma, Brownfield Biotechnology (requires 26% Indian stake). Insurance & Defense mentioned as having this cap before further liberalization.100% Cap (Examples - Large List): Greenfield Pharma/Biotech, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Hotels, Tourism, Infrastructure (Railways, Airports, Ports, Roads), Manufacturing (Chemicals, Motors, Electronics, Textiles, Automobiles), E-commerce (Marketplace), Renewable Energy, Leather Products, Food Processing, SEZs, Industrial Corridors, White Label ATMs, Single Brand Retail Trading (with conditions), Coal & Lignite Mining, Insurance (speaker says 100%, recent change ), Defense (100% possible with Govt. approval ).
Key Distinctions: Brownfield vs. Greenfield: Brownfield (investing in existing company, often lower caps like 74% auto) vs. Greenfield (setting up new company, often higher caps like 100% auto).Automatic vs. Approval Route: Many sectors allow FDI up to a certain limit automatically; higher stakes require specific government approval.
Understanding the shift from pre-1991 restrictions to post-1991 liberalization. Knowing the key policy changes regarding foreign technology access and FDI. Being aware of sector-specific FDI limits, especially those with caps lower than 100% (e.g., 20%, 26%, 49%, 51%, 74%) and prohibited sectors. Understanding concepts like Royalty, FIPB, DIPP/DPIIT, Brownfield/Greenfield, Multi-Brand/Single-Brand retail.
No comments:
Post a Comment