Okay, here are the comprehensive notes covering all the points mentioned in the Telugu lecture on the Indian Planning System.
Topic: National Planning System (Jatheeya Pranalika Vyavastha) Focus of Study: Goals / Objectives (Lakshyalu) Strategies (Vyoohalu) Achievements / Successes (Saadhinchina Vijayalu)
This is central to understanding the Five Year Planning System in India.
What is a Plan (Pranalika)? It is a combination of three essential elements:Goals/Objectives (Lakshyalu): Clearly defined targets to be achieved.Resources (Vanarulu): Available means (financial, human, natural) to achieve the goals.Specific Time Period (Nirnita Kaalam/Samayam): A defined duration within which the goals should be met using the resources.
Formula: Goals + Resources + Time Period = PlanApplicability: This concept applies to any planning effort, not just national economic planning (e.g., building a house involves setting a time frame, budget/resources, and the objective/design).
Planning is often implicit even in daily activities (e.g., organizing a housewarming or wedding involves objectives, resource allocation, and timelines). A Strategy (Vyooham) is the method or approach adopted to utilize resources effectively to achieve goals within the set time.National Development Planning: Applies the same principles:National resources are channeled towards development goals. Specific strategies are formulated. Implemented within defined time frames (like Five Year Plans). Definition Reiteration: Planning is the process of choosing specific strategies to achieve predetermined goals within a fixed period using available resources.
Origin: The first country to formally implement a national planning system wasRussia .Key Figure (Russia): Joseph Stalin was the main driving force behind the implementation of planning in Russia.Context: Post the 1917 Russian Revolution, which ended Tsarist rule and aimed for a Socialist system, Russia faced significant socio-economic challenges (Samajika Rugmathalu).Lenin's Efforts: Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) initially tried reforms, but Stalin's systematic planning approach proved more effective in mobilizing resources and achieving rapid development.Stalin's Title: Due to his pioneering role and the success demonstrated in Russia, Stalin is often called the"Father of Planning" (Pranalikala Pitha) at the world level.
Inspiration: India, particularly Nehru, drew inspiration from the Russian planning model.Key Figure (Implementation): Jawaharlal Nehru was the principal architect of implementing the planning system in independent India.Nehru's Titles: "Architect/Maker of Indian Planning" (Bharatha Pranalika Nirmata) "Sculptor" (Roopashilpi) "Guide" (Margadarshi) "Visionary" (Daarshanikudu) (In English: Architect of Indian Planning)
Key Figure (Idea/Concept): Sir M. Visvesvaraya is considered a seminal figure for conceptualizing planning in India.Visvesvaraya's Title: "Father of Indian Planning" (Bharatha Pranalika Pitha).Reason: He authored the book"Planned Economy for India" in 1934 , highlighting the necessity of planning for India's development well before independence and implementation.
Distinction: Visvesvaraya emphasized the need for planning.Nehru implemented the planning system.
National Planning Committee (NPC) (Bharatha Jatheeya Pranalika Committee): Established: 1938 Purpose: To formulate planning policies and methods for India. Chairman: Jawaharlal NehruContext: Formed under the presidency ofSubhas Chandra Bose at the Indian National Congress (INC). (Important distinction: Nehru was NPC Chairman, Bose was INC President at the time).
Department of Planning and Development (Pranalika Mariyu Abhivruddhi Shakha): Established: 1944 (During British rule)Purpose: A governmental department focused on planning. Chairman: Ardeshir Dalal (A. Dalal)
High-Level Advisory Planning Board: Established: 1946 (By the Interim Government)Purpose: To advise on the future planning machinery. Chairman: K. C. Neogy
Recommendation: The K. C. Neogy-led High-Level Advisory Planning Board recommended setting up a Planning Commission.Planning Commission of India (Bharatha Pranalika Sangham): Established: March 15, 1950 .
First Five Year Plan: Commenced onApril 1, 1951 .Initial Suggestion for a Commission: The idea of specifically forming aPlanning Commission as a body was first mooted bySubhas Chandra Bose .
Abolition: The Planning Commission was dissolved onAugust 17, 2014 .Announcement Context: PM Narendra Modi, in his Independence Day speech on August 15, 2014, stated that the Planning Commission was outdated and needed replacement with a new institution suited for contemporary challenges.Replacement Body: NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India).NITI Aayog Established: Came into effect onJanuary 1, 2015 .Reason for Change (Brief): The old structure was seen as inadequate for current needs, fostering cooperative federalism, and adapting to a globalized economy.
Planning Commission Established: March 15, 1950 First Plan Started: April 1, 1951 Planning Commission Abolished: August 17, 2014 NITI Aayog Started: January 1, 2015 These dates are frequently asked in competitive exams (like Group II, III, IV, SI, Constable, and even Civil Services Prelims for NITI Aayog).
Understanding economic systems is crucial for understanding planning approaches. Three Main Types: Capitalist Economy (Pettubadidari Arthika Vyavastha): Means of production owned and controlled primarily by private individuals/entities.Socialist Economy (Samyavada Arthika Vyavastha): Means of production owned and controlled primarily by the state/government.Mixed Economy (Mishrama Arthika Vyavastha): Co-existence of both private and public/state ownership and control.
Traditional Basis: Control over themeans of production .Better Basis: Role and control ofMarket Forces (Market Shakthulu) .Market Forces Components: Production Decisions: What to produce, how much.Distribution Mechanism: How goods and services reach consumers.Price Determination: How prices are set.
Socialist: Government controls Production, Distribution, and Price Determination. Minimal private role.Capitalist: Market mechanisms (supply, demand, private competition) primarily determine Production, Distribution, and Prices. Minimal government intervention (Laissez-faire ideal).Mixed: Government regulates/influences market forces and may control strategic sectors, while the private sector operates in others. A blend of state control and market freedom.Country Examples: Capitalist: USA, UK, Germany, Japan, Australia. Socialist: (Historically/Theoretically) Russia, China, Vietnam, Venezuela. Mixed: India.
Adam Smith: Considered the "Father of Economics" (Arthashastra Pithamahudu).Author of "The Wealth of Nations" (1776).Advocated for capitalist principles (free markets).
The Great Depression (1929-30): A major global economic crisis primarily affecting capitalist nations. Highlighted the potential instability and lack of regulation in purely capitalist systems. Led to a questioning of the laissez-faire approach.
Post-Depression, many nations saw the need for greater state intervention in the economy. The perceived stability or different recovery path of planned economies like Russia increased the appeal of socialist/mixed models.
Over time, purely state-controlled economies faced problems: Inefficiency and losses in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). Burden on the government budget (fiscal deficits). Increased government debt (internal and external). Diversion of funds from development/welfare. Balance of payment issues due to import needs and lack of export competitiveness.
Failings of both pure capitalism (instability) and pure socialism (inefficiency) led to the rise of the Mixed Economy model as a pragmatic solution. Characteristics: Government regulates markets, ensures social welfare, controls strategic sectors, while allowing private enterprise to drive growth in other areas.Many countries (including developed and developing nations like UK, China, Indonesia, Malaysia) adopted economic reforms moving towards or refining their mixed economy structures. Conclusion: Mixed economies are generally considered the most balanced and robust systems today.
The next lecture will delve deeper into the specific features and characteristics of Capitalist, Socialist, and Mixed economies.
No comments:
Post a Comment